
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX TITAN X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX TITAN X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (268mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX TITAN X holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $150), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 23.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Vega Frontier Edition and GeForce GTX TITAN X

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1382 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,753 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition scores 12,753 and the GeForce GTX TITAN X reaches 12,621 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce GTX TITAN X uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Raw compute: 13.11 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Boost clocks: 1600 MHz vs 1075 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,753+1% | 12,621 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+33% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.11 TFLOPS+96% | 6.691 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1600 MHz+49% | 1075 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256+33% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1.1 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X has 12 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (FL 12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs NVDEC 2nd gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X).
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | NVENC 2nd gen |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | NVDEC 2nd gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN X's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 268mm | 267mm |
| Height | 105mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 83°C-2% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.5 | 50.5+19% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 and now averages $120. The GeForce GTX TITAN X costs 20% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 85.0 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs 105.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 23.8% better value. The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $120-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.0 | 105.2+24% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GM200 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | March 17 2015 |
| Ranking | #203 | #209 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















