Radeon X1270
VS
Radeon 9550 / X1050

Radeon X1270 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050

AMD

Radeon X1270

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 9550 / X1050

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon X1270 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 9550 / X1050.

InsightRadeon X1270Radeon 9550 / X1050
Performance
Leading raw performance (+6.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-6.9%)
Longevity
GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon X1270 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 6.9% better value per dollar than the Radeon 9550 / X1050.

InsightRadeon X1270Radeon 9550 / X1050
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+6.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1270 and Radeon 9550 / X1050

AMD

Radeon X1270

The Radeon X1270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31 points.

AMD

Radeon 9550 / X1050

The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1270 scores 31 versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 29 — the Radeon X1270 leads by 6.9%. The Radeon X1270 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon X1270) vs 512 (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1270) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

FeatureRadeon X1270Radeon 9550 / X1050
G3D Mark Score
31+7%
29
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7864 TFLOPS
1.247 TFLOPS+59%
Boost Clock
1024 MHz
1218 MHz+19%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
96 KB
128 KB+33%
L2 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon X1270Radeon 9550 / X1050
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon X1270) vs 512 KB (Radeon 9550 / X1050) — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon X1270Radeon 9550 / X1050
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0b (Radeon X1270) vs 9_0 (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon X1270Radeon 9550 / X1050
DirectX
9_0b
9_0
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1270 draws 50W versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1270) vs 350W (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 165mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureRadeon X1270Radeon 9550 / X1050
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
165mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Perf/Watt
0.6
0.6
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon X1270 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 launched at $0 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.6 (Radeon X1270) vs 0.6 (Radeon 9550 / X1050) — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 offers 0% better value.

FeatureRadeon X1270Radeon 9550 / X1050
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$49
$49
Performance per Dollar
0.6
0.6
Codename
Polaris 24
Lexa
Release
May 13 2019
March 27 2019
Ranking
#898
#772