Radeon X1600 vs Quadro FX 350M

Radeon X1600

2020Boost: 2105 MHz

Quadro FX 350M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

+8.9%

Mobility Radeon X1400

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1600 is positioned at rank 364 and the Quadro FX 350M is on rank 228, so the Quadro FX 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1600

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

29016%

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

27876%

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

27552%

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

27504%

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

27448%

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

27292%

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

26948%

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

26848%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

26600%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

26528%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

26208%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

26152%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

25680%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

25664%

#349

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

32000%

#364

Radeon X1600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $49

100%

#365

GeForce FX 5700LE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

100%

#366

GeForce PCX 5750

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

92%

#367

GeForce FX 5700

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

84%

#368

RADEON X800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $20

80%

#369

RADEON X800 XL

MSRP: $349|Avg: $15

80%

#370

RADEON 9600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

72%

#371

RADEON X800 PRO

MSRP: $399|Avg: $15

64%

#372

GeForce FX 5200LE

MSRP: $43|Avg: $25

64%

#373

GeForce FX 5200SE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

48%

#374

RADEON 9800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $30

44%

#375

GeForce FX 5200

MSRP: $70|Avg: $25

44%

#376

GeForce PCX 5300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

40%

#377

GeForce FX 5900

MSRP: $399|Avg: $20

36%

#378

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

36%

#379

GeForce FX 5100

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

32%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 350M

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

98%

#96

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

96%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

93%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

93%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

91%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

84%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

81%

#213

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3283%

#228

Quadro FX 350M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

96%

#238

FirePro 3D V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

81%

#240

Quadro K600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

81%

#241

FirePro S7000

MSRP: $1249|Avg: $40

80%

#242

Quadro P5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

80%

#243

FirePro V7000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $100

78%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon X1600 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The Radeon X1600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 350M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon X1600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 350M.

Insight	Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 350M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+8.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.9%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon X1600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon X1600 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 350M Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1600 and Quadro FX 350M

Radeon X1600

The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1600 scores 49 versus the Quadro FX 350M's 45 — the Radeon X1600 leads by 8.9%. The Radeon X1600 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Radeon X1600) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).

Feature	Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 350M
G3D Mark Score	49+9%	45
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	4608+1820%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	19.4 TFLOPS+3018%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	288+260%	80

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 350M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon X1600 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350M has 256 MB. The Radeon X1600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 350M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0c (Radeon X1600) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 350M
DirectX	9_0c	9.0c
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon X1600) vs None (Quadro FX 350M). Decoder: Avivo vs PureVideo HD (VP1).

Feature	Radeon X1600	Quadro FX 350M
Encoder	Avivo	None
Decoder	Avivo	PureVideo HD (VP1)
Codecs	—	MPEG-2,WMV9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1600 draws 255W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 29.7% difference. The Quadro FX 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1600) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.