Radeon X1600
VS
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

Radeon X1600 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

AMD

Radeon X1600

2020Boost: 2105 MHz
VS
AMD

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon X1600 is positioned at rank #364 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1600

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
29016%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
27876%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
27552%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
27504%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
27448%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
27292%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
26948%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
26848%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
26600%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
26528%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
26208%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
26152%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
25680%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
25664%
#349
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
32000%
#364
Radeon X1600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $49
100%
#365
GeForce FX 5700LE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#366
GeForce PCX 5750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
92%
#367
GeForce FX 5700
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
84%
#368
RADEON X800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $20
80%
#369
RADEON X800 XL
MSRP: $349|Avg: $15
80%
#370
RADEON 9600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
72%
#371
RADEON X800 PRO
MSRP: $399|Avg: $15
64%
#372
GeForce FX 5200LE
MSRP: $43|Avg: $25
64%
#373
GeForce FX 5200SE
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
48%
#374
RADEON 9800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $30
44%
#375
GeForce FX 5200
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
44%
#376
GeForce PCX 5300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
40%
#377
GeForce FX 5900
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
36%
#378
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
36%
#379
GeForce FX 5100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
32%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon X1600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700.

InsightRadeon X1600RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Performance
Leading raw performance (+16.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-16.7%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)
RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $49 for the Radeon X1600, it costs 39% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 40% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon X1600RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+40%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1600 and RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

AMD

Radeon X1600

The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

AMD

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1600 scores 49 versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 42 — the Radeon X1600 leads by 16.7%. The Radeon X1600 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Radeon X1600) vs 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Raw compute: 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Boost clocks: 2105 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

FeatureRadeon X1600RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
G3D Mark Score
49+17%
42
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
RDNA 4.0
Process Node
7 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
4608+13%
4096
Compute (TFLOPS)
19.4 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS+147%
Boost Clock
2105 MHz
2920 MHz+39%
ROPs
64
128+100%
TMUs
288+13%
256

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon X1600RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon X1600RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0c (Radeon X1600) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon X1600RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
DirectX
9_0c
9.0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon X1600) vs None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Decoder: Avivo vs VideoShader.

FeatureRadeon X1600RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Encoder
Avivo
None
Decoder
Avivo
VideoShader
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1600 draws 255W versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 300W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon X1600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1600) vs 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 175mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureRadeon X1600RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
TDP
255W-15%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
168mm
175mm
Height
100mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
0.2+100%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon X1600 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.0 (Radeon X1600) vs 1.4 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers 40% better value. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).

FeatureRadeon X1600RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
MSRP
$199
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$49
$30-39%
Performance per Dollar
1.0
1.4+40%
Codename
Navi 21
Navi 48
Release
October 28 2020
July 23 2025
Ranking
#34
#23