RADEON X600XT vs Radeon X1650 Pro
RADEON X600XT
Popular choices:
Radeon X1650 Pro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 Pro
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X600XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1650 Pro.
| Insight | RADEON X600XT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X600XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the Radeon X1650 Pro, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 62.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X600XT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+62.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X600XT and Radeon X1650 Pro
RADEON X600XT
The RADEON X600XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points. Launch price was $999.
Radeon X1650 Pro
The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X600XT scores 92 versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 85 — the RADEON X600XT leads by 8.2%. The RADEON X600XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 5,120 (RADEON X600XT) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 92+8% | 85 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+100% | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2250 MHz | 2581 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 320+100% | 160 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X600XT draws 300W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon X1650 Pro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X600XT) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X600XT launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100 and now averages $15. The RADEON X600XT costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.2 (RADEON X600XT) vs 5.7 (Radeon X1650 Pro) — the RADEON X600XT offers 61.4% better value. The Radeon X1650 Pro is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2+61% | 5.7 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 22 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #35 | #92 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X600XT and Radeon X1650 Pro
