Radeon HD 6250 vs RADEON X600XT

AMD

Radeon HD 6250

2010Boost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON X600XT

2020Core: 1825 MHzBoost: 2250 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 6250 vs RADEON X600XT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6250 vs RADEON X600XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6250 vs RADEON X600XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6250

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON X600XT

2020

Why buy it

  • Radeon HD 6250 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X600XT is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6250 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (94 vs 92), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON X600XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 40nm, 80 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6250 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON X600XT has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6250 vs RADEON X600XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6250

The Radeon HD 6250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

RADEON X600XT

The RADEON X600XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6250 scores 94 and the RADEON X600XT reaches 92 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6250 is built on TeraScale 3 while the RADEON X600XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon HD 6250) vs 5,120 (RADEON X600XT). Raw compute: 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6250) vs 23.04 TFLOPS (RADEON X600XT). Boost clocks: 800 MHz vs 2250 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 6250RADEON X600XT
G3D Mark Score
94+2%
92
Architecture
TeraScale 3
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1408
5120+264%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.253 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS+923%
Boost Clock
800 MHz
2250 MHz+181%
ROPs
32
128+300%
TMUs
88
320+264%
L1 Cache
0.34 MB
1 MB+194%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6250RADEON X600XT
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6250 and 64-bit on the RADEON X600XT. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6250) vs 4 MB (RADEON X600XT) — the RADEON X600XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6250RADEON X600XT
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6250 draws 200W versus the RADEON X600XT's 300W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 6250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6250) vs 350W (RADEON X600XT). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon HD 6250RADEON X600XT
TDP
200W-33%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Legacy
Perf/Watt
0.5+67%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6250 came in at $50, while the RADEON X600XT launched at $0. On MSRP, RADEON X600XT was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Radeon HD 6250) vs Infinity (RADEON X600XT) — the RADEON X600XT offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X600XT (2020 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 6250RADEON X600XT
MSRP
$50
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
1.9
Infinity
Codename
Cayman
Navi 21
Release
December 14 2010
October 28 2020
Ranking
#623
#35

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.