RADEON X800 XT vs Quadro FX Go1400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X800 XT is positioned at rank 368 and the Quadro FX Go1400 is on rank 349, so the Quadro FX Go1400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 XT

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

36270%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

34845%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

34440%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

34380%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

34310%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

34115%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

33685%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

33560%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

33250%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

33160%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

32760%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

32690%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

32100%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

32080%

#352

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

40000%

#367

RADEON X800 XL

MSRP: $349|Avg: $15

100%

#368

RADEON X800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $20

100%

#369

RADEON 9600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

90%

#370

RADEON X800 PRO

MSRP: $399|Avg: $15

80%

#371

GeForce FX 5200LE

MSRP: $43|Avg: $25

80%

#372

GeForce FX 5200SE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

60%

#373

GeForce FX 5200

MSRP: $70|Avg: $25

55%

#374

RADEON 9800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $30

55%

#375

GeForce PCX 5300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

50%

#376

GeForce FX 5900

MSRP: $399|Avg: $20

45%

#377

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

45%

#378

GeForce FX 5100

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

40%

#379

GeForce FX 5600XT

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

35%

#380

GeForce FX 5600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $10

35%

#381

GeForce4 Ti 4200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $5

15%

#382

GeForce3 Ti 200

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

15%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX Go1400

#334

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

14483%

#349

Quadro FX Go1400

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#350

GRID K520

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50

96%

#351

GRID P40-12Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

95%

#352

FirePro 2270

MSRP: $149|Avg: $30

93%

#353

FirePro 2460

MSRP: $180|Avg: $10

92%

#355

Quadro FX 580

MSRP: $199|Avg: $500

89%

#356

FirePro 3D V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

89%

#357

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

88%

#359

FireStream 9270

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20

87%

#360

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

86%

#361

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

86%

#362

Quadro FX 380 LP

MSRP: $169|Avg: $15

84%

#364

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON X800 XT is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The RADEON X800 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX Go1400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX Go1400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X800 XT.

Insight	RADEON X800 XT	Quadro FX Go1400
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+1500%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX Go1400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON X800 XT Benchmark Check

Quadro FX Go1400 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800 XT and Quadro FX Go1400

RADEON X800 XT

The RADEON X800 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points. Launch price was $649.

Quadro FX Go1400

The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RADEON X800 XT scores 98 and the Quadro FX Go1400 reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X800 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro FX Go1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON X800 XT) vs 192 (Quadro FX Go1400). Raw compute: 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 XT) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400).

Feature	RADEON X800 XT	Quadro FX Go1400
G3D Mark Score	98	102+4%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	4608+2300%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.74 TFLOPS+4386%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	128+433%	24
TMUs	288+350%	64
L2 Cache	4 MB+2005%	0.19 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X800 XT	Quadro FX Go1400
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON X800 XT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX Go1400 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX Go1400 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON X800 XT) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX Go1400) — the RADEON X800 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X800 XT	Quadro FX Go1400
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	4 GB+1500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+2005%	0.19 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X800 XT draws 300W versus the Quadro FX Go1400's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro FX Go1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 XT) vs 350W (Quadro FX Go1400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.