CPU
GPU
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Arc A770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Per Dollar Arc A770
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A770 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Alchemist / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (280mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and Arc A770
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,508 points.
Arc A770
The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU scores 13,508 and the Arc A770 reaches 13,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Arc A770 uses Generation 12.7, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 4,096 (Arc A770). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770). Boost clocks: 2025 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 32 (Arc A770) with 400 Tensor cores vs 512.
| Feature | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,508+1% | 13,332 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+213% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+232% | 19.66 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2025 MHz | 2400 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 176+38% | 128 |
| TMUs | 400+56% | 256 |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+350% | 16 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100+213% | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 400 | 512+28% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A770 has 16 GB. The Arc A770 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 16 MB (Arc A770) — the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+350% | 16 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A770). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770).
| Feature | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU draws 35W versus the Arc A770's 225W — a 146.2% difference. The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 650W (Arc A770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 280mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-84% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 280mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 385.9+551% | 59.3 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $280 |
| Codename | AD102 | DG2-512 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #16 | #191 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and Arc A770
