GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs Arc A770
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Arc A770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar Arc A770
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Alchemist / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (280mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $280 for the Arc A770, it costs 25% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 26% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($209) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Arc A770
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Arc A770
The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the Arc A770's 13,332 — the Arc A770 leads by 6.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Arc A770 uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 4,096 (Arc A770). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 32 (Arc A770) with 80 Tensor cores vs 512.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535 | 13,332+6% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS | 19.66 TFLOPS+116% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2400 MHz+35% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 80 | 256+220% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 16 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 32+60% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 512+540% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A770 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A770 has 16 GB. The Arc A770 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 512 GB/s (Arc A770) — a 128.6% advantage for the Arc A770. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 16 MB (Arc A770) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 512 GB/s+129% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 16 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A770). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Arc A770's 225W — a 53.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 650W (Arc A770). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-42% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 280mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-12% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+63% | 59.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the Arc A770 launched at $349 and now averages $280. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 25.4% less ($71 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 47.6 (Arc A770) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 26.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-29% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209-25% | $280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0+26% | 47.6 |
| Codename | GA106 | DG2-512 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #211 | #191 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Arc A770
