RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs Quadro RTX 4000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

#7

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#16

Radeon RX 7600S

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

155%

#19

Radeon RX 5600

MSRP: $229|Avg: $150

137%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000

#32

Radeon AI PRO R9700

MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450

133%

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

130%

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

113%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

109%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

108%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

106%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

106%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

102%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

100%

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

92%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

90%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

89%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

87%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

86%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

85%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

82%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

80%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

77%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

76%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is significantly newer (2024 vs 2018). The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro RTX 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU.

Insight	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	Quadro RTX 4000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0%)
Longevity	🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022))
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX 4000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and Quadro RTX 4000

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,923 points. Launch price was $649.

Quadro RTX 4000

The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU scores 14,923 and the Quadro RTX 4000 reaches 14,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000). Raw compute: 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000). Boost clocks: 2130 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 22 RT cores (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 4000) with 88 Tensor cores vs 288.

Feature	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	Quadro RTX 4000
G3D Mark Score	14,923	14,925
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2816+22%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	12 TFLOPS+69%	7.119 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2130 MHz+38%	1545 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	88	144+64%
L1 Cache	2.8 MB+22%	2.3 MB
L2 Cache	12 MB+200%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	22	36+64%
Tensor Cores	88	288+227%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	Quadro RTX 4000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2.0	DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation	FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)	DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) — a 75% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	Quadro RTX 4000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	256 GB/s	448 GB/s+75%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	12 MB+200%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	Quadro RTX 4000
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000).

Feature	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	Quadro RTX 4000
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	PureVideo HD VP10
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU draws 50W versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 160W — a 104.8% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	Quadro RTX 4000
TDP	50W-69%	160W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	241mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	298.5+220%	93.3