RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs Quadro P6000
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Quadro P6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+193%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and Quadro P6000
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,848 points.
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU scores 15,848 and the Quadro P6000 reaches 15,512 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 15.62 TFLOPS (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,848+2% | 15,512 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+20% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.62 TFLOPS+24% | 12.63 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+22% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 144 | 240+67% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+221% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 193% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 68.8% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 23.438 GB+193% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 432 GB/s+69% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU draws 115W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 74% difference. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-54% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 137.8+122% | 62.0 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $5999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1500 |
| Codename | AD106 | GP102 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #134 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and Quadro P6000
