RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs Radeon Pro Vega II
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro Vega II
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega II
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega II.
| Insight | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | GCN 5.1 (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ⚠️ Potential Buffer Bottleneck |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and Radeon Pro Vega II
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,848 points.
Radeon Pro Vega II
The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU scores 15,848 and the Radeon Pro Vega II reaches 15,597 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega II uses GCN 5.1, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Raw compute: 15.62 TFLOPS (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,848+2% | 15,597 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+13% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.62 TFLOPS+11% | 14.09 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+16% | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 144 | 256+78% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+350% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega II relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II has 0 MB. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II) — a 237.5% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II) — the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 864 GB/s+238% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II).
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU draws 115W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II's 475W — a 122% difference. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-76% | 475W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 137.8+320% | 32.8 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1800 |
| Codename | AD106 | Vega 20 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | June 3 2019 |
| Ranking | #134 | #138 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and Radeon Pro Vega II
