
GeForce RTX 3060 vs CMP 30HX

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

CMP 30HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Per Dollar CMP 30HX
Why is GeForce RTX 3060 better than CMP 30HX?
The NVIDIA CMP 30HX is a dedicated mining GPU based on the Turing architecture (TU116, similar to the GTX 1660 SUPER), while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a high-performance gaming card based on the Ampere architecture. In gaming, the RTX 3060 Ti is roughly 100-120% faster, offering features that are entirely absent or disabled on the CMP 30HX.
The CMP 30HX has no display outputs and lacks the Ray Tracing and Tensor cores found in the RTX 3060 Ti. While the 3060 Ti features 4,864 CUDA cores and 8GB of GDDR6 memory for high-refresh 1440p gaming, the CMP 30HX is limited to 1,408 shader units and 6GB of memory, optimized solely for Ethereum mining efficiency rather than real-time rendering.
For any gaming or standard workstation use, the RTX 3060 Ti is the only choice. The CMP 30HX is a specialized tool for cryptocurrency miners and is essentially unusable for gaming without significant workarounds and lack of video ports, making the 3060 Ti the clear winner.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 247.4% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 30HX.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+247.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-247.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The CMP 30HX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $289 for the GeForce RTX 3060, it costs 79% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 38.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+38.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and CMP 30HX

GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the CMP 30HX's 4,892 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 247.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the CMP 30HX uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1,408 (CMP 30HX). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+247% | 4,892 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+155% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+153% | 5.027 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 112+27% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+150% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+100% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 30HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the CMP 30HX has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+100% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 (CMP 30HX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs No (CMP 30HX). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs No.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | No |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | No |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the CMP 30HX's 125W — a 30.5% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (CMP 30HX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 125W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+156% | 39.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $289, while the CMP 30HX launched at $799 and now averages $60. The CMP 30HX costs 79.2% less ($229 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 81.5 (CMP 30HX) — the CMP 30HX offers 38.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-59% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $289 | $60-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.8 | 81.5+39% |
| Codename | GA106 | TU116 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | February 25 2021 |
| Ranking | #114 | #447 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















