GeForce RTX 3060
VS
FirePro M6100

GeForce RTX 3060 vs FirePro M6100

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

2021Core: 1320 MHzBoost: 1777 MHz
VS

FirePro M6100

2014Core: 1100 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060

#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
109%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
108%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
107%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
105%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
105%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
104%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
103%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
102%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
102%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
102%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
101%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
101%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
101%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
100%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
100%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
100%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
100%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
99%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
98%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
96%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
95%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
95%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
94%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
94%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
93%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
92%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
92%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
91%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
90%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
89%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Why is GeForce RTX 3060 better than FirePro M6100?

The matchup between the powerful GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and the legacy mobile professional FirePro M6100 reveals the massive divide between modern enthusiast power and previous-gen workstation efficiency. The RTX 3060 Ti delivers roughly 2000% more raw compute performance, moving from a chip that can barely handle basic 1080p tasks to a desktop powerhouse that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates and cinematic graphics.

The architectural gap is monumental. The RTX 3060 Ti features 8GB of fast dedicated memory and specialized hardware for Ray Tracing and DLSS, whereas the FirePro M6100 is based on a legacy architecture and lacks the core count for modern high-fidelity textures. Moving from a legacy workstation notebook to an RTX 3060 Ti powered desktop is a life-changing improvement, providing the speed and visual stability needed for high-end rendering and professional creative work in 2026.

There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the absolute winner. it provides a level of immersion and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, cinematic experiences. The FirePro M6100 is strictly piece of hardware history. if you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly world-class, the 30-series discrete card is the definitive and superior choice.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3060 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 3060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro M6100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 581.2% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M6100.

InsightGeForce RTX 3060FirePro M6100
Performance
Leading raw performance (+581.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-581.2%)
Longevity
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro M6100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $289 for the GeForce RTX 3060, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 41.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce RTX 3060FirePro M6100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+41.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and FirePro M6100

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

AMD

FirePro M6100

The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the FirePro M6100's 2,495 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 581.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the FirePro M6100 uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 896 (FirePro M6100). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (FirePro M6100).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060FirePro M6100
G3D Mark Score
16,995+581%
2,495
Architecture
Ampere
GCN 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3584+300%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.74 TFLOPS+546%
1.971 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
112+100%
56
L1 Cache
3.5 MB+1491%
0.22 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB+1100%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro M6100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060FirePro M6100
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2.0
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro M6100 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro M6100) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060FirePro M6100
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+500%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB+1100%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 (FirePro M6100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060FirePro M6100
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro M6100). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264 (FirePro M6100).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060FirePro M6100
Encoder
NVENC 7th Gen
VCE 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC 5th Gen
UVD 4.2
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the FirePro M6100's 150W — a 12.5% difference. The FirePro M6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (FirePro M6100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060FirePro M6100
TDP
170W
150W-12%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
0mm
Height
112mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75-12%
85
Perf/Watt
100.0+502%
16.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $289, while the FirePro M6100 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The FirePro M6100 costs 89.6% less ($259 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 83.2 (FirePro M6100) — the FirePro M6100 offers 41.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060FirePro M6100
MSRP
$329
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$289
$30-90%
Performance per Dollar
58.8
83.2+41%
Codename
GA106
Emerald
Release
January 12 2021
May 27 2014
Ranking
#114
#638