GeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 424775% higher G3D Mark score and 2300% more VRAM (12 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX/MX 400.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+424775%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-424775%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $289 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 21952.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce2 MX/MX 400.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+21952.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and GeForce2 MX/MX 400
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 4 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 424775%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+424775% | 4 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+300% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+295% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+13% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+2300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+71% | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+283% | 1.2 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 25W — a 148.7% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 55°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 25W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 55°C-27% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+49900% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $289, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 launched at $129 and now averages $15. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 costs 94.8% less ($274 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.3 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 19500% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce2 MX/MX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $129-61% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $289 | $15-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.8+19500% | 0.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #114 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3060 and GeForce2 MX/MX 400
