
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro 4000

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Quadro 4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000
Why is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Quadro 4000?
Comparing the powerful GeForce RTX 3060 Ti to the legacy professional Quadro 4000 highlights over fifteen years of astronomical GPU progress. The RTX 3060 Ti is roughly 3000% faster, representing the jump from a core that pioneered modern design in 2010 to an iconic desktop powerhouse that masters 1440p Ultra and introduces world-class Ray Tracing depth.
Technically, these two share no ground. The RTX 3060 Ti features 8GB of fast dedicated memory and specialized hardware for Ray Tracing and mature DLSS support. The Quadro 4000 is based on a legacy Fermi architecture and lacks the core count or feature set to handle modern interactive media with any stability. Moving from any workstation with legacy graphics to an RTX 3060 Ti powered desktop is a transformative upgrade, providing the speed and visual stability needed for high-end rendering work in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the absolute winner. it provides a level of detail and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, immersive experiences. The legacy Quadro 4000 is now strictly piece of hardware history. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the 30-series discrete card is the definitive and superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 3060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1052.2% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 4000.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1052.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1052.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $289 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 19.6% better value per dollar than the Quadro 4000.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+19.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Quadro 4000

GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Quadro 4000
The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Quadro 4000's 1,475 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 1052.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Quadro 4000 uses Fermi, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 256 (Quadro 4000). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+1052% | 1,475 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+1300% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+2519% | 0.4864 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+250% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+600% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro 4000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 4000 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 4000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Quadro 4000's 142W — a 17.9% difference. The Quadro 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Quadro 4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 142W-16% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+862% | 10.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $289, while the Quadro 4000 launched at $1199 and now averages $30. The Quadro 4000 costs 89.6% less ($259 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 49.2 (Quadro 4000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 19.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-73% | $1199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $289 | $30-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.8+20% | 49.2 |
| Codename | GA106 | GF100 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | November 2 2010 |
| Ranking | #114 | #770 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














