GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro W6900X
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro W6900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W6900X
Why is Radeon Pro W6900X better than GeForce RTX 3060?
Comparing the industrial Radeon Pro W6900X to the enthusiast GeForce RTX 3060 Ti reveals two very different levels of graphical muscle. The Radeon Pro W6900X is a workstation powerhouse from the RDNA 2 era, featuring a massive 32GB memory buffer and raw rasterization performance that can exceed the 3060 Ti by 15-20% in professional benchmarks. It is designed for massive datasets and mission-critical rendering.
Technically, the Radeon Pro W6900X wins on absolute bandwidth and memory scale, making it the definitive choice for enterprise 3D design and scientific computing. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, however, offers a more optimized consumer feature set and better Ray Tracing stability for gaming. While the PRO card is more powerful in raw brute force, the 30-series card provides the better balance of price and features for mainstream users. Both are world-class engines, but they serve different industries entirely.
The Radeon Pro W6900X is the winner for professional studios and engineers who need uncompromised memory scale and workstation reliability. it is a world-class industrial tool. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the winner for desktop enthusiasts who want elite 1440p gaming and efficient creative performance on a budget. For anyone looking for the most raw muscle between these two in 2026, the industrial Radeon card is the clear and superior winner by scale.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W6900X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (32 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3060.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $289 versus $5,000 for the Radeon Pro W6900X, it costs 94% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1588.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1588.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($289) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon Pro W6900X
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Radeon Pro W6900X
The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 and the Radeon Pro W6900X reaches 17,413 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro W6900X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 22.02 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6900X). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2150 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 80 (Radeon Pro W6900X) with 112 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995 | 17,413+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 5120+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS | 22.02 TFLOPS+73% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2150 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 48 | 128+167% |
| TMUs | 112 | 320+186% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+250% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W6900X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6900X has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro W6900X offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the Radeon Pro W6900X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro W6900X's 300W — a 55.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-43% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+72% | 58.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $289, while the Radeon Pro W6900X launched at $6000 and now averages $5000. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 94.2% less ($4711 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3.5 (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 1580% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-95% | $6000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $289-94% | $5000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.8+1580% | 3.5 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #114 | #101 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon Pro W6900X
