RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs GeForce RTX 3090
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3090
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3090 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (24 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU.
| Insight | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (312mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3090 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and GeForce RTX 3090
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,267 points.
GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU scores 25,267 versus the GeForce RTX 3090's 26,594 — the GeForce RTX 3090 leads by 5.3%. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 3090 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090). Raw compute: 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 82 (GeForce RTX 3090) with 160 Tensor cores vs 328.
| Feature | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 25,267 | 26,594+5% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120 | 10496+105% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.82 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS+125% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1695 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 160 | 328+105% |
| L1 Cache | 5 MB | 10.3 MB+106% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 82+105% |
| Tensor Cores | 160 | 328+105% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3090 has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) — a 116.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 936 GB/s+117% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090).
| Feature | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU draws 115W versus the GeForce RTX 3090's 350W — a 101.1% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 3090). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 105mm vs 312mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-67% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 105mm | 312mm |
| Height | 82mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 219.7+189% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $900 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #81 | #37 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and GeForce RTX 3090
