RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (16 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU.
| Insight | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,119 points.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU scores 22,119 and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB reaches 22,713 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Raw compute: 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) with 192 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,119 | 22,713+3% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+41% | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 26.73 TFLOPS+21% | 22.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2535 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+41% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+40% | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+50% | 32 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+41% | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 192+41% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — a 50% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s+50% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+50% | 32 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU draws 110W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 165W — a 40% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Power connectors: Mobile vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 241mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2.2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-33% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 150W-73% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 241mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2.2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 201.1+46% | 137.7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
