GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs FirePro S7150
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
FirePro S7150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S7150
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than FirePro S7150?
The matchup between the professional FirePro S7150 and the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB reveals the monumental divide between previous-gen specialized efficiency and modern desktop muscle. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB delivers roughly 1500% more raw compute performance, moving from a chip designed for high-density multi-user virtualization to a desktop powerhouse that masters 1440p Ultra with cinematic graphics.
Technically, the FirePro S7150 wins on absolute virtualized scale, featuring pioneering MxGPU technology for sharing hardware across multiple cloud instances. However, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB features superior Ada Lovelace interactive efficiency and introduces next-gen specialized cores for Ray Tracing and DLSS 3 support. Moving from any virtualized notebook or legacy server to a 40-series discrete engine is a life-changing improvement for most users seeking uncompromised interactive speed in 2026.
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the undisputed winner in absolute interactive performance and frame stability. it is a world-class engine for high-fidelity digital environments. The AMD FirePro S7150 remains the winner for enterprise IT managers who priority uncompromised virtual machine density and certified stability in server-grade rigs. however, for any individual setup, the discrete 40-series card is the definitive and superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S7150 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 500.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro S7150.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+500.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-500.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $380 versus $459 for the FirePro S7150, it costs 17% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 625.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+625.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($380) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($459) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and FirePro S7150
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
FirePro S7150
The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the FirePro S7150's 3,770 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 500.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the FirePro S7150 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,048 (FirePro S7150). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+501% | 3,770 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+113% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+485% | 3.768 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+6% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+760% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro S7150 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro S7150 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S7150 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (FirePro S7150). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the FirePro S7150's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The FirePro S7150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (FirePro S7150). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+464% | 25.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the FirePro S7150 launched at $2399 and now averages $459. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 17.2% less ($79 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8.2 (FirePro S7150) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 626.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-83% | $2399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380-17% | $459 |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6+627% | 8.2 |
| Codename | AD106 | Tonga |
| Release | May 18 2023 | February 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #59 | #521 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and FirePro S7150
