GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 420
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
GeForce4 MX 420
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 MX 420
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 452920% higher G3D Mark score and 12598.4% more VRAM (8 GB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 MX 420.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+452920%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-452920%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $380 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 11821.6% better value per dollar than the GeForce4 MX 420.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+11821.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GeForce4 MX 420
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
GeForce4 MX 420
The GeForce4 MX 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the GeForce4 MX 420's 5 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 452920%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce4 MX 420 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 420). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 420). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+452920% | 5 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+386% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+584% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+61% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+113% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce4 MX 420 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce4 MX 420 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 420 has 65 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 12598.4% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+12598% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 420). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+74% | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+207% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs None (GeForce4 MX 420). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 420).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | None |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the GeForce4 MX 420's 25W — a 145.9% difference. The GeForce4 MX 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 420). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 25W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 60°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+70700% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the GeForce4 MX 420 launched at $99 and now averages $10. The GeForce4 MX 420 costs 97.4% less ($370 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 (GeForce4 MX 420) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 11820% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $99-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $10-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6+11820% | 0.5 |
| Codename | AD106 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #59 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GeForce4 MX 420
