
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon 840M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon 840M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 840M
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon 840M?
Comparing the legacy mobile Radeon 840M to the modern enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB reveals the monumental progress made in GPU power over a decade. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more than 3000% faster, representing a jump from a budget laptop chip of 2014 to a powerhouse that masters 1440p Ultra gaming today with ease. This is the difference between a legacy multimedia accelerator and a modern AI-enhanced icon.
Technically, these two share no ground. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB features a massive 16GB VRAM buffer and next-gen specialized cores for AI and Path Tracing. The Radeon 840M is limited by legacy technology and tiny memory that cannot even support modern DirectX 12 games at playable rates. Moving to an RTX 4060 Ti system is a life-changing improvement, turning stuttering legacy software into silk-smooth, cinematic high-fidelity visuals for any application in 2026.
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the undisputed winner in this comparison, providing a level of speed and features that the older mobile chip simply cannot replicate. it is the definitive choice for anyone who wants a world-class experience in gaming, 3D design, or AI research. The Radeon 840M is now strictly piece of hardware history. if you are looking for a performance boost that will completely revitalize your digital life, the 16GB 40-series card is the superior and definitive winner.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 495.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 840M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+495.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-495.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon 840M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon 840M
The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon 840M's 3,803 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 495.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon 840M uses RDNA 3+, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 256 (Radeon 840M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+496% | 3,803 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3+ |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+1600% | 256 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2900 MHz+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 840M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 840M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 840M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon 840M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 840M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 840M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon 840M's 30W — a 136.8% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon 840M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 90.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 30W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-22% | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+12% | 126.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 840M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | Krackan Point |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #59 | #516 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












