GeForce RTX 4060 vs Arc B580
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Arc B580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar Arc B580
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 22.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc B580 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+22.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-22.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 Battlemage / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (272mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $249), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1.9% better value per dollar than the Arc B580.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) | ✅More affordable ($249) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Arc B580
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Arc B580
The Arc B580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 13 2024. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2670 MHz to 2670 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,977 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Arc B580's 15,977 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 22.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Arc B580 uses Xe2, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,560 (Arc B580). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 13.67 TFLOPS (Arc B580). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2670 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 20 (Arc B580) with 96 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+22% | 15,977 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+11% | 13.67 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz | 2670 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 96 | 160+67% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 5 MB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+33% | 18 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24+20% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 160+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc B580 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc B580 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc B580 has 12 GB. The Arc B580 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 456 GB/s (Arc B580) — a 67.6% advantage for the Arc B580. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 18 MB (Arc B580) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 456 GB/s+68% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+33% | 18 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc B580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs Xe2 Media Engine (Arc B580). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Xe2 Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (Arc B580).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | Xe2 Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Xe2 Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Arc B580's 190W — a 49.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 600W (Arc B580). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 272mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-39% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-8% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 272mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | 70°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+102% | 84.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the Arc B580 launched at $249 and now averages $249. The Arc B580 costs 16.7% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 64.2 (Arc B580) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1.9% better value. The Arc B580 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $249-17% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $249-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+2% | 64.2 |
| Codename | AD107 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | December 13 2024 |
| Ranking | #84 | #132 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Arc B580
