GeForce RTX 4060 vs FirePro S9050
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
FirePro S9050
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9050
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than FirePro S9050?
The matchup between the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and the legacy mobile flagship FirePro S9050 reveals a monumental divide between modern power and previous-gen workstation efficiency. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB delivers roughly 1500% more raw compute performance, moving from a chip that can barely handle basic CAD tasks to a desktop powerhouse that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates and cinematic graphics.
Technically, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB wins on absolute architectural scale, featuring a massive 16GB VRAM buffer—wider than the 12GB found on the legacy pro card—along with next-gen specialized cores for Ray Tracing and DLSS 3 support. The FirePro S9050 is based on a legacy architecture and lacks the core count or features to handle modern software at playable rates. Moving from any legacy workstation or device to a 40-series card powered tower is a life-changing improvement for most users in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the absolute winner. it provides a level of detail and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, immersive experiences. The FirePro S9050 is strictly piece of hardware history. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the 16GB 40-series card is the definitive and superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S9050 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 298.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro S9050.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+298.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-298.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $299 versus $1,825 for the FirePro S9050, it costs 84% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 2334.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2334.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($299) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,825) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and FirePro S9050
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
FirePro S9050
The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the FirePro S9050's 4,901 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 298.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the FirePro S9050 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,792 (FirePro S9050). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+299% | 4,901 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+71% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+368% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 112+17% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+582% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+3100% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro S9050 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro S9050 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S9050 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+3100% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (FirePro S9050). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the FirePro S9050's 225W — a 64.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (FirePro S9050). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 254mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-49% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 254mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-19% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+680% | 21.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 and now averages $1825. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 83.6% less ($1526 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.7 (FirePro S9050) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 2322.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-85% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299-84% | $1825 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+2322% | 2.7 |
| Codename | AD107 | Tahiti |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 7 2014 |
| Ranking | #84 | #446 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and FirePro S9050
