GeForce RTX 4060 vs FirePro W600
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
FirePro W600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than FirePro W600?
The comparison between the AMD FirePro W600 and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB shows the contrast between a specialized multi-display legacy professional card and a high-efficiency modern gaming and creative beast. The FirePro W600 was released in 2012 for digital signage, supporting six mini-DisplayPort outputs. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a 2023 modern workhorse built with the latest Ada Lovelace architecture.\n\nThe performance distance is enormous. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more than 25 times faster in graphics rendering and includes cutting-edge features like Ray Tracing and AI-driven DLSS 3. The FirePro W600, while excellent for its time in driving multiple screens, lacks the compute power and modern DX12/Vulkan support required for today's creative software or gaming. The 16GB of modern VRAM on the RTX card is also a massive upgrade for professionals working with large datasets or high-resolution timelines.\n\nUltimately, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the vastly superior choice for almost any imaginative task today. The FirePro W600 is a niche tool from a previous era, while the 40-series card provides a level of speed and visual fidelity that defines the modern standard. For anyone upgrading from a legacy professional setup, this jump represents a complete transformation in workflow capability.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2012). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1053.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W600.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1053.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1053.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 15.7% better value per dollar than the FirePro W600.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+15.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and FirePro W600
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the FirePro W600's 1,695 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1053.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the FirePro W600 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 512 (FirePro W600). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+1053% | 1,695 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+500% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+1867% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+2208% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+9500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro W600 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro W600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W600 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro W600) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+9500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (FirePro W600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264 (FirePro W600).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the FirePro W600's 75W — a 42.1% difference. The FirePro W600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (FirePro W600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs Unknown.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 75W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | Unknown-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+652% | 22.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the FirePro W600 launched at $599 and now averages $30. The FirePro W600 costs 90% less ($269 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 56.5 (FirePro W600) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 15.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-50% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $30-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+16% | 56.5 |
| Codename | AD107 | Cape Verde |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #84 | #732 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and FirePro W600
