GeForce RTX 4060 vs FirePro W7100
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
FirePro W7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7100
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than FirePro W7100?
The matchup between the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and the legacy mobile professional FirePro W7100 reveals a monumental divide between modern power and previous-gen workstation efficiency. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB delivers roughly 2000% more raw compute performance, moving from a chip that can handle basic design tasks to a desktop powerhouse that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates and cinematic graphics.
Technically, these two share no ground. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB features a massive 16GB VRAM buffer—double the 8GB found on the legacy pro card—along with next-gen specialized cores for Path Tracing and DLSS 3. The FirePro W7100 is based on a legacy architecture and lacks the core count or feature set to handle modern software at playable rates. Moving from any notebook or station with legacy graphics to a 40-series Ti desktop is a life-changing improvement for most users in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the absolute winner. it provides a level of immersion and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, cinematic experiences. The FirePro W7100 is now strictly piece of hardware history. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly world-class, the 16 GB 40-series card is the definitive and superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W7100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 285.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W7100.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+285.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-285.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $114), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 47.1% better value per dollar than the FirePro W7100.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+47.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) | ✅More affordable ($114) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and FirePro W7100
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
FirePro W7100
The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the FirePro W7100's 5,065 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 285.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the FirePro W7100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,792 (FirePro W7100). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+286% | 5,065 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+71% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+358% | 3.297 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 112+17% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+582% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro W7100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro W7100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro W7100) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the FirePro W7100's 150W — a 26.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (FirePro W7100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 95.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-23% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-23% | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+403% | 33.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the FirePro W7100 launched at $799 and now averages $114. The FirePro W7100 costs 61.9% less ($185 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 44.4 (FirePro W7100) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 47.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-63% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $114-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+47% | 44.4 |
| Codename | AD107 | Tonga |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #84 | #406 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and FirePro W7100
