
GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 54% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+54%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-54%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $110 versus $299 for the GeForce RTX 4060, it costs 63% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 76.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+76.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) | ✅More affordable ($110) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER's 12,692 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 54%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+54% | 12,692 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+118% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+201% | 5.027 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+38% | 1785 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96+9% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+114% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1500% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — a 23.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 336 GB/s+24% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1500% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER's 125W — a 8.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-8% | 125W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 450W-18% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+67% | 101.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229 and now averages $110. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER costs 63.2% less ($189 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 115.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 76.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $229-23% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $110-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4 | 115.4+76% |
| Codename | AD107 | TU116 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 29 2019 |
| Ranking | #84 | #207 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














