GeForce RTX 4060
VS
GeForce GTX 480M

GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce GTX 480M

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 480M

2010Core: 425 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
111%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
107%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
105%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
105%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
105%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
104%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
103%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
103%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
102%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
101%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
100%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
100%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
98%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
98%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
98%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
97%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
96%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
95%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
94%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
94%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
92%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
92%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
92%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
91%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
91%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
91%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 480M

#189
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
394%
#191
357%
#192
356%
#196
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
324%
#197
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
322%
#199
GeForce GTX 480M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#203
GeForce GT 730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
98%
#206
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#208
Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#212
GeForce GTX 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce GTX 480M?

Comparing the GeForce GTX 480M to the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB illustrates the incredible distance covered in 13 years of graphics development. The GTX 480M was the ultimate mobile flagship in 2010, based on the power-hungry Fermi architecture. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a modern, highly efficient Ada Lovelace card built for serious 1080p and 1440p gaming.\n\nIn raw performance, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is nearly 30 times more powerful and introduces features that were science fiction when the 480M launched, such as hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI Frame Generation. While the GTX 480M was a pioneer in mobile performance, it lacked the thermal efficiency and feature set necessary for modern gaming and is now entirely unsupported by current drivers. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB comfortably runs any modern title at ultra settings with a fraction of the power consumption.\n\nUltimately, this is a comparison between a legendary piece of computing history and a state-of-the-art modern workhorse. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the definitive choice for any user seeking high-end performance today, while the GTX 480M remains an important milestone in the journey toward the portable power we enjoy now.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 480M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1082.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 480M.

InsightGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 480M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1082.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1082.6%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and GeForce GTX 480M

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 480M

The GeForce GTX 480M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 25 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 425 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,653 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GeForce GTX 480M's 1,653 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1082.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 480M uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 352 (GeForce GTX 480M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480M).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 480M
G3D Mark Score
19,548+1083%
1,653
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Fermi
Process Node
5 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
3072+773%
352
Compute (TFLOPS)
15.11 TFLOPS+2425%
0.5984 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
96+118%
44
L1 Cache
3 MB+335%
0.69 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB+4700%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 480M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 480M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 480M
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 480M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 480M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 480M
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
272 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
24 MB+4700%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 480M
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+15%
4.0
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480M).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 480M
Encoder
NVENC 8th gen
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
NVDEC 5th gen
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GeForce GTX 480M's 100W — a 14% difference. The GeForce GTX 480M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 480M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 95°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 480M
TDP
115W
100W-13%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
240mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
73°C-23%
95°C
Perf/Watt
170.0+930%
16.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 480M
MSRP
$299
Avg Price (30d)
$299
Codename
AD107
GF100
Release
May 18 2023
May 25 2010
Ranking
#84
#743