
GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce GTX 950M

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 950M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 950M
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce GTX 950M?
The matchup between the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and the legacy mobile GeForce GTX 950M highlights nearly a decade of astronomical GPU progress. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more than 3500% faster, representing the jump from a mid-range notebook chip of 2015 to a desktop card that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates and cinematic graphics today.
Technically, these two share no ground. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB features a massive 16GB VRAM buffer and next-gen specialized cores for Ray Tracing and DLSS Frame Generation. The GTX 950M is based on the legacy Maxwell architecture and lacks the core count or features to handle modern high-fidelity textures at playable rates. Moving from any notebook to an RTX 4060 Ti powered desktop is a life-changing improvement, providing the speed and fluidity needed for high-end rendering and professional creative work in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the absolute winner. it provides a level of speed and visual fidelity that makes the most demanding games look like high-resolution cinema. The GeForce GTX 950M is now strictly for basic office use on legacy notebooks. if you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly world-class, the 16GB 40-series card is the definitive and superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 950M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 659.1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+659.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-659.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and GeForce GTX 950M

GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

GeForce GTX 950M
The GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 914 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,575 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GeForce GTX 950M's 2,575 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 659.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 950M uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 950M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950M). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+659% | 2,575 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+380% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+950% | 1.439 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+119% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+140% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+868% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 950M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 950M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GeForce GTX 950M's 75W — a 42.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 950M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 75W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+396% | 34.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | — |
| Codename | AD107 | GM107 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #84 | #626 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














