GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro K2000D
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Quadro K2000D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000D
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro K2000D?
Comparing the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB to the legacy professional Quadro K2000D reveals the massive divide between modern enthusiast power and previous-gen base workstation graphics. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB delivers roughly 5000% more raw compute performance, moving from a chip that can barely handle 2D display tasks to a card that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates and cinematic graphics.
The architectural gap is monumental. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB features a massive 16GB of VRAM and specialized hardware for Path Tracing and DLSS 3. The Quadro K2000D features only 2GB of VRAM and lacks the core count or features to handle modern high-fidelity textures with any stability. Moving from a legacy low-profile card to an RTX 4060 Ti desktop is a life-changing improvement, providing the speed and visual fidelity needed for high-end rendering and professional creative work in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the absolute winner. it provides a level of immersion and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, cinematic experiences. The Quadro K2000D is strictly for basic display output and legacy productivity on budget machines. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly world-class, the 16GB 40-series card is the definitive and superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2000D lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1121.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K2000D.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1121.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1121.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $35), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 43% better value per dollar than the Quadro K2000D.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+43%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro K2000D
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Quadro K2000D
The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro K2000D's 1,600 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1121.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K2000D uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 384 (Quadro K2000D). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+1122% | 1,600 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+700% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+1962% | 0.7327 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+9900% | 0.03 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+9500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro K2000D lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K2000D relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000D has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro K2000D) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+9500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000D).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro K2000D's 51W — a 77.1% difference. The Quadro K2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro K2000D). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 202mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 51W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 202mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+441% | 31.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the Quadro K2000D launched at $599 and now averages $35. The Quadro K2000D costs 88.3% less ($264 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 45.7 (Quadro K2000D) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 43.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-50% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $35-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+43% | 45.7 |
| Codename | AD107 | GK107 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #84 | #750 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro K2000D
