GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro K2000M
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Quadro K2000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2012). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1847% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K2000M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1847%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1847%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 95.4% better value per dollar than the Quadro K2000M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+95.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro K2000M
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Quadro K2000M
The Quadro K2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,004 points. Launch price was $265.27.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro K2000M's 1,004 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1847%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K2000M uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 384 (Quadro K2000M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5722 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+1847% | 1,004 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+700% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+2541% | 0.5722 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+9900% | 0.03 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+9500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro K2000M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K2000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro K2000M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+9500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 11.1 (11_0) (Quadro K2000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+8% | 11.1 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC (Quadro K2000M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro K2000M's 55W — a 70.6% difference. The Quadro K2000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro K2000M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 55W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+829% | 18.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2000M costs 90% less ($269 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 33.5 (Quadro K2000M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 95.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $30-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+95% | 33.5 |
| Codename | AD107 | GK107 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #84 | #886 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro K2000M
