GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro M620
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Quadro M620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro M620?
The matchup between the Quadro M620 and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB shows more than six years of rapid progress in mobile and desktop graphics technology. The Quadro M620 was an entry-level professional GPU for mobile workstations in 2017, whereas the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a 2023 modern desktop mid-range powerhouse.\n\nThe performance gap is massive, with the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB being 10 to 12 times faster in almost every scenario. It features dedicated Ray Tracing hardware, AI-driven DLSS 3 upscaling, and a massive 16GB of VRAM that allows for modern 2K and 4K workflows. The Quadro M620, with its limited 2GB of VRAM and aging Maxwell architecture, now lacks the driver support and hardware features required to run modern professional suites or games effectively.\n\nUltimately, the Quadro M620 is a legacy mobile component that reflects the entry-level workstation standards of several years ago. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a versatile modern tool that provides a level of fidelity, speed, and memory capacity that makes the older mobile professional card completely obsolete for current workflows and high-end gaming.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M620 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 608.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M620.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+608.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-608.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $299 for the GeForce RTX 4060, it costs 87% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 5.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro M620
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Quadro M620
The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro M620's 2,758 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 608.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro M620 uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 512 (Quadro M620). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 977 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+609% | 2,758 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+500% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+1411% | 1 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+152% | 977 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M620 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M620 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M620 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Quadro M620) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12_1 (Quadro M620). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 5th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro M620's 30W — a 117.2% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro M620). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 30W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+85% | 91.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the Quadro M620 launched at $0 and now averages $40. The Quadro M620 costs 86.6% less ($259 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 69.0 (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 offers 5.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $40-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4 | 69.0+6% |
| Codename | AD107 | GM107 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #84 | #606 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro M620
