GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon HD 6900M
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6900M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6900M
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon HD 6900M?
The matchup between the Radeon HD 6900M and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB showcases the monumental progress in mobile-to-desktop transitions. The Radeon HD 6900M was a high-end mobile GPU in 2011, found in flagship gaming laptops of its era. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a 2023 desktop card focusing on modern efficiency and high VRAM capacity.\n\nIn terms of performance, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is approximately 25 times more powerful and introduces features like hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing and AI-driven Frame Generation that didn't exist when the HD 6900M was released. The older mobile card is no longer supported by modern AMD drivers, making it incapable of running many current titles. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB comfortably runs modern games at ultra settings with its 16GB buffer, providing a level of accessibility and performance that was science fiction in 2011.\n\nUltimately, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a massive, transformative upgrade. The Radeon HD 6900M represents the peak of portable gaming technology from over a decade ago, but for today's standards, it is completely outmatched by even modern entry-level desktop solutions. The transition to the 40-series provides a night-and-day difference in resolution, fidelity, and system speed.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2011). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6900M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1045.2% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6900M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon HD 6900M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1045.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1045.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon HD 6900M
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Radeon HD 6900M
The Radeon HD 6900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,707 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon HD 6900M's 1,707 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1045.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon HD 6900M uses TeraScale 2, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6900M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6900M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon HD 6900M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+1045% | 1,707 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+220% | 960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+1057% | 1.306 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+100% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+1479% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon HD 6900M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 6900M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon HD 6900M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6900M has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6900M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon HD 6900M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon HD 6900M's 75W — a 42.1% difference. The Radeon HD 6900M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6900M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon HD 6900M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 75W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+646% | 22.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon HD 6900M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | — |
| Codename | AD107 | Blackcomb |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #84 | #654 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon HD 6900M
