GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon Pro 460
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 460
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 460
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon Pro 460?
Comparing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB to the AMD Radeon Pro 460 reveals a massive technological divide between a modern desktop powerhouse and a legacy mobile workstation GPU. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, released in 2023, is estimated to be over 480% faster in synthetic benchmarks than the 2016 Polaris-based mobile chip.
With 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM and support for hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing and DLSS 3 Frame Generation, the RTX 4060 Ti is built for high-end 1080p and 1440p gaming. The Radeon Pro 460, mostly found in older MacBook Pro models, features only 4GB of GDDR5 memory and lacks the raw processing power or modern APIs to run contemporary AAA titles efficiently. In fact, in titles like Grand Theft Auto V, the RTX 4060 Ti can be up to 393% faster.
The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the definitive winner for any modern workstation or gaming setup. The Radeon Pro 460 is now considered a legacy component, suitable for basic photo editing and productivity tasks on older laptops, but it cannot compete in any capacity with the raw performance and advanced AI features of a modern 40-series GPU.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 460 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 466.1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 460.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+466.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-466.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 184% better value per dollar than the Radeon Pro 460.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+184%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon Pro 460
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Radeon Pro 460
The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon Pro 460's 3,453 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 466.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 460). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 907 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+466% | 3,453 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+200% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+713% | 1.858 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+171% | 907 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+2300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 460 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 460 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 460) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+2300% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon Pro 460's 35W — a 106.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 460). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 35W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+72% | 98.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro 460 costs 49.8% less ($149 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 23.0 (Radeon Pro 460) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 184.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-40% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $150-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+184% | 23.0 |
| Codename | AD107 | Baffin |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #84 | #547 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon Pro 460
