GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon Pro 465
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 465
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 465
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon Pro 465?
The matchup between the Radeon Pro 465 and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB illustrates the gap between specialized mobile professional graphics and state-of-the-art dedicated desktop performance. The Radeon Pro 465 was a professional mobile GPU released in 2017, designed for reliable performance in laptops. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a 2023 Ada Lovelace card focusing on modern efficiency and professional-grade memory capacity.\n\nIn raw performance, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is approximately 8 to 10 times more powerful and introduces features like hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing and AI Frame Generation (DLSS 3) that provide a significant edge in both gaming and creative workflows. While the Radeon Pro 465 was impressive for its ability to handle professional rendering on the go in its era, it is strictly limited by its older architecture and limited VRAM. The RTX card's massive 16GB buffer enables complex professional datasets and high-fidelity gaming that the older mobile chip cannot managing.\n\nUltimately, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the vastly superior choice for any contemporary professional or gamer. The Radeon Pro 465 remains a piece of mobile workstation history, representing the best of its time over seven years ago. For any current user, the transition to the 40-series provides a transformative jump in both rendering speed and feature compatibility.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 465 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 330.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 465.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+330.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-330.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 116.1% better value per dollar than the Radeon Pro 465.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+116.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon Pro 465
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon Pro 465's 4,538 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 330.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 907 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+331% | 4,538 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+200% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+713% | 1.858 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+171% | 907 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+2300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 465 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 465 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 465 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+2300% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 106.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 35W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+31% | 129.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro 465 costs 49.8% less ($149 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 30.3 (Radeon Pro 465) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 115.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-40% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $150-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+116% | 30.3 |
| Codename | AD107 | Baffin |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #84 | #547 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon Pro 465
