CPU
GPU
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 255
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon R9 255?
The matchup between the high-end GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and the legacy entry-level Radeon R9 255 reveal over over a decade of astronomical GPU progress. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB delivers roughly 5000% more raw compute muscle, moving from a chip that struggled with 1080p in 2014 to a desktop powerhouse that masters uncompromised 1440p Ultra gaming with ease.
The architectural gap is monumental. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB features a massive 16GB of dedicated fast memory and specialized hardware for Path Tracing and DLSS 3 support. The Radeon R9 255 is a legacy solution and lacks the core count or feature set to handle modern interactive media with any stability. Moving from any legacy device to a 40-series powered tower is a transformative upgrade, providing the speed and visual stability needed for the most demanding digital environments in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the absolute winner. it provides a level of detail and depth that turns the most demanding games into fluid, cinematic experiences. The Radeon R9 255 is now strictly piece of hardware history. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the 16GB 40-series card is the superior and definitive choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 255 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1202.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 255.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 255 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1202.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1202.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 30.7% better value per dollar than the Radeon R9 255.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 255 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+30.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon R9 255
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Radeon R9 255
The Radeon R9 255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,501 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon R9 255's 1,501 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1202.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 255 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 255). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 255).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 255 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+1202% | 1,501 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+71% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+359% | 3.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 112+17% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+582% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 255 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 255 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 255 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 255 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 255) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 255 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon R9 255's 190W — a 49.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 400W (Radeon R9 255). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 255 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-39% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 400W-27% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+2052% | 7.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the Radeon R9 255 launched at $139 and now averages $30. The Radeon R9 255 costs 90% less ($269 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 50.0 (Radeon R9 255) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 30.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 255 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $139-54% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $30-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+31% | 50.0 |
| Codename | AD107 | Tonga |
| Release | May 18 2023 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #84 | #365 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon R9 255
