GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 198.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GH.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+198.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-198.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX Vega M GH
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 6,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 198.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+199% | 6,548 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+100% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+313% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+107% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+689% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+2300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega M GH lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega M GH relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — a 32.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+33% | 204.8 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 1024-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+2300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 14% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 100W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 240mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+160% | 65.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($299 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | AD107 | Polaris 22 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #84 | #373 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX Vega M GH
