GeForce RTX 4060 vs RTX A2000 12GB
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 12GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 42.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A2000 12GB.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+42.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-42.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $299 versus $380 for the RTX A2000 12GB, it costs 21% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 81.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+81.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($299) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX A2000 12GB
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 13,721 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 42.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 26 (RTX A2000 12GB) with 96 Tensor cores vs 104.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+42% | 13,721 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3328+8% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+89% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+105% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 104+8% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 3.3 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 26+8% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 104+8% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A2000 12GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX A2000 12GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 70W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0 | 196.0+15% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449 and now averages $380. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 21.3% less ($81 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 36.1 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 81.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-33% | $449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299-21% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+81% | 36.1 |
| Codename | AD107 | GA106 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #84 | #177 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX A2000 12GB
