RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTX 6000 Ada Generation

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

147%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

145%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

143%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

140%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

133%

#87

A10G

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000

130%

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

129%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

127%

#90

Quadro P5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

121%

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

120%

#92

RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

117%

#93

Quadro RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

117%

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

105%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

103%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

100%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

100%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

98%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

90%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

87%

#102

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500

76%

#103

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999

70%

#104

Radeon Pro W6900X

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000

69%

#105

Quadro RTX 6000

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800

68%

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

64%

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

62%

#108

Quadro M6000

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500

56%

#109

Quadro M6000 24GB

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600

56%

#110

Quadro GV100

MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999

50%

#111

Tesla P40

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150

49%

#112

GRID RTX6000-1Q

MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500

48%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 261.6% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (48 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	RTX 6000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+261.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-261.6%)
Longevity	🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (48 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $5,500 for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation, it costs 99% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 1928% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RTX 6000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1928%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,500)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX 6000 Ada Generation and GeForce GTX 1650

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation scores 28,454 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 261.6%. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2505 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	RTX 6000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	28,454+262%	7,869
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	18176+1929%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	91.06 TFLOPS+2952%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2505 MHz+50%	1665 MHz
ROPs	192+500%	32
TMUs	568+914%	56
L1 Cache	17.8 MB+1923%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	96 MB+9500%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RTX 6000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 650% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RTX 6000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	48 GB+1100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	960 GB/s+650%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	96 MB+9500%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	RTX 6000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	RTX 6000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC 8th Gen	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 16-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	RTX 6000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	300W	75W-75%
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	16-pin	None
Length	267mm	229mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	94.8	104.9+11%

💰

Value Analysis

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799 MSRP and currently averages $5500, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 98.6% less ($5425 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1917.3% better value. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).