RTX A1000 Embedded GPU vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU.
| Insight | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+8%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A1000 Embedded GPU and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU scores 11,009 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 8%. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1140 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 64 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,009 | 11,892+8% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.669 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+92% |
| Boost Clock | 1140 MHz | 1755 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 2.5 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 20+25% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 80+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 115.2% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 82mm vs 235mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-73% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 82mm | 235mm |
| Height | 4mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 314.5+244% | 91.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A1000 Embedded GPU and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
