
RTX A1000 Mobile vs Radeon R9 390X

RTX A1000 Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 390X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTX A1000 Mobile is positioned at rank #174 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A1000 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A1000 Mobile is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The RTX A1000 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 390X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A1000 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 390X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A1000 Mobile | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (277mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A1000 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A1000 Mobile and Radeon R9 390X

RTX A1000 Mobile
The RTX A1000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,463 points.

Radeon R9 390X
The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A1000 Mobile scores 9,463 and the Radeon R9 390X reaches 9,278 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A1000 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX A1000 Mobile) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X). Raw compute: 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Mobile) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X). Boost clocks: 1140 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Mobile | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,463+2% | 9,278 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2816+38% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.669 TFLOPS | 5.914 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 1140 MHz+9% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 176+175% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+190% | 0.69 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A1000 Mobile | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A1000 Mobile comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 390X has 8 GB. The Radeon R9 390X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A1000 Mobile) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 390X) — the RTX A1000 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Mobile | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A1000 Mobile) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Mobile | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Mobile) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Mobile) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X).
| Feature | RTX A1000 Mobile | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A1000 Mobile draws 60W versus the Radeon R9 390X's 275W — a 128.4% difference. The RTX A1000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A1000 Mobile) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 277mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Mobile | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-78% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 277mm |
| Height | 0mm | 129mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 157.7+368% | 33.7 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A1000 Mobile is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | RTX A1000 Mobile | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $429 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $70 |
| Codename | GA107 | Grenada |
| Release | March 30 2022 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #277 | #287 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















