RTX A4500 vs GeForce GTX 1060
RTX A4500
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A4500 uses modern memory architecture. The RTX A4500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 109.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1060 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A4500 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+109.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-109.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $800 for the RTX A4500, it costs 93% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 536.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4500 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+536.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($800) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4500 and GeForce GTX 1060
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX A4500 scores 21,094 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the RTX A4500 leads by 109.6%. The RTX A4500 is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 7,168 (RTX A4500) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 21,094+110% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 7168+180% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.65 TFLOPS+167% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1733 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+40% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 7 MB+645% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4500 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 133.3% advantage for the RTX A4500. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (RTX A4500) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+133% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (RTX A4500) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4500 draws 200W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 10.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (RTX A4500) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 180W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 400W-11% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 105.5+89% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4500 launched at $1699 MSRP and currently averages $800, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 92.5% less ($740 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.4 (RTX A4500) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 535.2% better value. The RTX A4500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1699 | $249-85% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $800 | $60-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.4 | 167.7+535% |
| Codename | GA102 | GP104 |
| Release | November 23 2021 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #68 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4500 and GeForce GTX 1060
