RTX A4500 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT
RTX A4500
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6750 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 6750 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A4500 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6750 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $320 versus $800 for the RTX A4500, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 145.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4500 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+145.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($800) | ✅More affordable ($320) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4500 and Radeon RX 6750 XT
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Radeon RX 6750 XT
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2150 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4500 scores 21,094 and the Radeon RX 6750 XT reaches 20,686 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4500 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6750 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,168 (RTX A4500) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Raw compute: 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500) vs 13.31 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 56 RT cores (RTX A4500) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) with 224 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 21,094+2% | 20,686 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 7168+180% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.65 TFLOPS+78% | 13.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 2600 MHz+58% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+40% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 7 MB+1300% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 56+40% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4500 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6750 XT has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — a 3.7% advantage for the RTX A4500. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (RTX A4500) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+4% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (RTX A4500) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6750 XT).
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4500 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 6750 XT's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The RTX A4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (RTX A4500) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 105.5+28% | 82.7 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4500 launched at $1699 MSRP and currently averages $800, while the Radeon RX 6750 XT launched at $549 and now averages $320. The Radeon RX 6750 XT costs 60% less ($480 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.4 (RTX A4500) vs 64.6 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — the Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 144.7% better value. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1699 | $549-68% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $800 | $320-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.4 | 64.6+145% |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 22 |
| Release | November 23 2021 | March 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #68 | #70 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4500 and Radeon RX 6750 XT
