RTX A4500 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
RTX A4500
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A4500 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $280 versus $800 for the RTX A4500, it costs 65% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 175.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4500 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+175.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($800) | ✅More affordable ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4500 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4500 scores 21,094 and the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti reaches 20,312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4500 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 7,168 (RTX A4500) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 56 RT cores (RTX A4500) vs 38 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) with 224 Tensor cores vs 152.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 21,094+4% | 20,312 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 7168+47% | 4864 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.65 TFLOPS+46% | 16.2 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+20% | 80 |
| TMUs | 224+47% | 152 |
| L1 Cache | 7 MB+46% | 4.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 56+47% | 38 |
| Tensor Cores | 224+47% | 152 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4500 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (RTX A4500) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (RTX A4500) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4500 draws 200W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 0% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (RTX A4500) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-25% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 105.5+4% | 101.6 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4500 launched at $1699 MSRP and currently averages $800, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 65% less ($520 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.4 (RTX A4500) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 174.6% better value. The RTX A4500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | RTX A4500 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1699 | $399-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $800 | $280-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.4 | 72.5+175% |
| Codename | GA102 | GA104 |
| Release | November 23 2021 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #68 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4500 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
