RTX A5500 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
RTX A5500
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A5500
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 49.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX A5500 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-49.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+49.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $590 versus $2,200 for the RTX A5500, it costs 73% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 457.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+457.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,200) | ✅More affordable ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A5500 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
RTX A5500
The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX A5500 scores 21,108 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 49.6%. The RTX A5500 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 10,240 (RTX A5500) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (RTX A5500) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 320 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | RTX A5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 21,108 | 31,578+50% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 10240+33% | 7680 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 34.1 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2610 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 96+20% | 80 |
| TMUs | 320+33% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 10 MB+33% | 7.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80+33% | 60 |
| Tensor Cores | 320+33% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A5500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX A5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A5500 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The RTX A5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 52.4% advantage for the RTX A5500. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (RTX A5500) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+100% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+52% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (RTX A5500) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | RTX A5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A5500 draws 230W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 21.4% difference. The RTX A5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (RTX A5500) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX A5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W-19% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-36% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.8 | 110.8+21% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A5500 launched at $3600 MSRP and currently averages $2200, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 73.2% less ($1610 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.6 (RTX A5500) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 457.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX A5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3600 | $799-78% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2200 | $590-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 53.5+457% |
| Codename | GA102 | AD104 |
| Release | March 22 2022 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #67 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A5500 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
