RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
RTX A4500 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX A4500 Mobile offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile and RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1657 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,940 points.
RTX A4500 Mobile
The RTX A4500 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,613 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile scores 16,940 and the RTX A4500 Mobile reaches 16,613 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX A4500 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,328 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Mobile). Raw compute: 11.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 17.66 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1657 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 26 RT cores (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 46 (RTX A4500 Mobile) with 104 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,940+2% | 16,613 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3328 | 5888+77% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.03 TFLOPS | 17.66 TFLOPS+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1657 MHz+10% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 104 | 184+77% |
| L1 Cache | 3.3 MB | 5.8 MB+76% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 26 | 46+77% |
| Tensor Cores | 104 | 184+77% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 Mobile has 16 GB. The RTX A4500 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 4 MB (RTX A4500 Mobile) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4500 Mobile). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RTX A4500 Mobile).
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile draws 45W versus the RTX A4500 Mobile's 140W — a 102.7% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 650W (RTX A4500 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-68% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 376.4+217% | 118.7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile and RTX A4500 Mobile
