RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell vs GeForce RTX 3090
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3090
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3090 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell.
| Insight | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (312mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3090 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $900 versus $1,700 for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell, it costs 47% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 89.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+89.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,700) | ✅More affordable ($900) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell and GeForce RTX 3090
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.
GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell scores 26,498 and the GeForce RTX 3090 reaches 26,594 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3090 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090). Raw compute: 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090). Boost clocks: 2055 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 82 (GeForce RTX 3090) with 280 Tensor cores vs 328.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,498 | 26,594 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 8960 | 10496+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 36.83 TFLOPS+4% | 35.58 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2055 MHz+21% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 112+17% |
| TMUs | 280 | 328+17% |
| L1 Cache | 8.8 MB | 10.3 MB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70 | 82+17% |
| Tensor Cores | 280 | 328+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 24 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) — a 116.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 936 GB/s+117% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090).
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell draws 140W versus the GeForce RTX 3090's 350W — a 85.7% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 3090). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 312mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-60% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 312mm |
| Height | 111mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 189.3+149% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1700, while the GeForce RTX 3090 launched at $1499 and now averages $900. The GeForce RTX 3090 costs 47.1% less ($800 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.6 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 29.5 (GeForce RTX 3090) — the GeForce RTX 3090 offers 89.1% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $1499-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1700 | $900-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.6 | 29.5+89% |
| Codename | GB203 | GA102 |
| Release | March 18 2025 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #48 | #37 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell and GeForce RTX 3090
