RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell vs RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Popular choices:
RTX PRO 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 21.1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (48 GB vs 32 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell.
| Insight | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-21.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+21.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $2,015 versus $8,565 for the RTX PRO 6000, it costs 76% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 251.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+251.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($2,015) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,565) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell and RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,431 points.
RTX PRO 6000
The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 35,431 versus the RTX PRO 6000's 42,899 — the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 21.1%. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 10,496 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000). Raw compute: 50.53 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 188 (RTX PRO 6000) with 328 Tensor cores vs 752.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35,431 | 42,899+21% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496 | 24064+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 50.53 TFLOPS | 115.8 TFLOPS+129% |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 112 | 176+57% |
| TMUs | 328 | 752+129% |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB | 23.5 MB+128% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 128 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82 | 188+129% |
| Tensor Cores | 328 | 752+129% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 6000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) — a 6.7% advantage for the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 48 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+7% | 960 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 128 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000).
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell draws 200W versus the RTX PRO 6000's 600W — a 100% difference. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 500W (RTX PRO 6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-67% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 177.2+148% | 71.5 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell launched at $2399 MSRP and currently averages $2015, while the RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565 and now averages $8565. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell costs 76.5% less ($6550 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.6 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell offers 252% better value.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399-72% | $8565 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2015-76% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6+252% | 5.0 |
| Codename | GB203 | GB202 |
| Release | March 18 2025 | 2025 |
| Ranking | #6 | #608 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell and RTX PRO 6000
