
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition vs GeForce RTX 5090

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5090
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.6% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (96 GB vs 32 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 5090.
| Insight | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (96 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5090 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $2,700 versus $8,199 for the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition, it costs 67% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 179.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+179.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,199) | ✅More affordable ($2,700) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition and GeForce RTX 5090

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition
The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,223 points.

GeForce RTX 5090
The GeForce RTX 5090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,867 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition scores 42,223 versus the GeForce RTX 5090's 38,867 — the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition leads by 8.6%. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 5090 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) vs 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090). Raw compute: 126 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090). Boost clocks: 2617 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 188 RT cores (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) vs 170 (GeForce RTX 5090) with 752 Tensor cores vs 680.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 42,223+9% | 38,867 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 24064+11% | 21760 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 126 TFLOPS+20% | 104.8 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2617 MHz+9% | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+9% | 176 |
| TMUs | 752+11% | 680 |
| L1 Cache | 23.5 MB+10% | 21.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 128 MB+33% | 96 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 188+11% | 170 |
| Tensor Cores | 752+11% | 680 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition comes with 96 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5090 has 32 GB. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 512-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) vs 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090) — the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 96 GB+200% | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1792 GB/s | 1792 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit | 512-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 MB+33% | 96 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5090). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 5090). Decoder: NVDEC 6th Gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5090).
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th Gen | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 6th Gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition draws 600W versus the GeForce RTX 5090's 575W — a 4.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 5090 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) vs 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 600W | 575W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-35% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.4+4% | 67.6 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition launched at $11605 MSRP and currently averages $8199, while the GeForce RTX 5090 launched at $1999 and now averages $2700. The GeForce RTX 5090 costs 67.1% less ($5499 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.1 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) vs 14.4 (GeForce RTX 5090) — the GeForce RTX 5090 offers 182.4% better value.
| Feature | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11605 | $1999-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8199 | $2700-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 14.4+182% |
| Codename | GB202 | GB202 |
| Release | March 18 2025 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #2 | #3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














