RTXA5000-6Q vs Intel UHD Graphics
RTXA5000-6Q
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTXA5000-6Q is positioned at rank #374 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-6Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTXA5000-6Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics.
| Insight | RTXA5000-6Q | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTXA5000-6Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTXA5000-6Q and Intel UHD Graphics
RTXA5000-6Q
The RTXA5000-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,522 points.
Intel UHD Graphics
The Intel UHD Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 10 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,511 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTXA5000-6Q scores 1,522 and the Intel UHD Graphics reaches 1,511 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTXA5000-6Q is built on Ampere while the Intel UHD Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 8 nm vs 10 nm+. Shader units: 8,192 (RTXA5000-6Q) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics). Raw compute: 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-6Q) vs 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 750 MHz.
| Feature | RTXA5000-6Q | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,522 | 1,511 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 10 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 8192+3100% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 27.77 TFLOPS+7132% | 0.384 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz+126% | 750 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+1100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 256+1500% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTXA5000-6Q | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTXA5000-6Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics has 0 MB. The RTXA5000-6Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | RTXA5000-6Q | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The RTXA5000-6Q draws 230W versus the Intel UHD Graphics's 10W — a 183.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTXA5000-6Q) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | RTXA5000-6Q | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 10W-96% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 6.6 | 151.1+2189% |
Value Analysis
The RTXA5000-6Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $2500, while the Intel UHD Graphics launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics costs 100+% less ($2500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.6 (RTXA5000-6Q) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics) — the Intel UHD Graphics offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | RTXA5000-6Q | Intel UHD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2500 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA102 | Jasper Lake GT1 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | January 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #53 | #666 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTXA5000-6Q and Intel UHD Graphics
